If marriage is a business relationship, a prenuptial agreement is like the incorporation documents. But what happens if during your marriage you find out the prenuptial agreement you paid for fails? For one woman, the results of a prenup fail could mean the loss of her entire inheritance.

Prenup Fails

Protecting Your Assets

After you and your spouse get married, ‘what’s theirs is yours, and what’s yours is now theirs.’ Unless you get a prenup. A prenuptial agreement is a written document between prospective spouses thinking about marriage. A prenup becomes effective upon marriage.

What can you put in a prenup? There are few limitations, but you can agree on your rights to any property either you or your spouse have or will have, who can manage and control the property, and what happens to property in the event of death or divorce. You can also agree to alimony, or to waive alimony, and many other issues that do not violate some public policy or criminal law.

There are two things she advises before getting married: (1) buy separate comforters for your bed, and (2) get a prenuptial agreement that fully protects you – even if you don’t think your assets are worth much. Without a prenup, you might learn you’re not be protected the hard way.

In the article, the reporter got married right out of graduate school and had no job. Her assets consisted of a used car, a cat, and an inheritance she kept in a trust fund. Her future husband had no assets, but was planning to go to dental school which had a hefty price tag. The Wife’s prenup ensured that her trust fund could not be used to pay for his graduate school tuition.

Notwithstanding her prenup though, during the marriage, the wife used her trust fund monies on their living expenses. Then she decided to ignore the prenup entirely. She used all of her premarital inheritance as a down payment on a marital home. Then she titled the house in both names. Then she also agreed her husband’s salary would pay the mortgage and most other bills related to “their” home.

Florida Prenuptial Agreements

I’ve written about prenuptial agreements before. Prenuptial agreements are not just for the rich and famous. Anyone who brings assets, or a large inheritance, into their marriage can benefit from a prenuptial agreement.

Prenups are important to have in place before a married couple starts investing in businesses, properties, and other investments.

But there can be ‘prenup fails’ too. In addition to being completely ignored, prenups can also be challenged in court. Florida has both case law and a statute to help lawyers, judges, and the parties determine if a prenuptial agreement is enforceable. For example, Florida adopted the Uniform Premarital Agreement Act.

The UPAA is a statute that requires that all premarital agreements be in writing and signed by both parties. It is enforceable without consideration other than the marriage itself.

Couples wanting to sign a prenup can enter into an agreement with respect to their rights and obligations in any of their property. Whenever and wherever property was acquired or where it is located; couples can control their right to buy, sell, use, transfer, or otherwise manage and control their property if they separate, divorce, or die.

When ruling on the validity of a prenup, Florida courts must consider things such as fraud, duress, coercion, in addition to the unfairness of the agreement, and whether there was any financial disclosure. While prenuptial agreements may be challenged in court, we will have to wait and see if the court will invalidate Costner’s prenuptial agreement.

A Messed-up Prenup?

After seven years, the husband informed his wife that he wanted a divorce. He also wanted to sell their jointly owned house and split the profits equally. Without a house though, the wife couldn’t qualify for a mortgage on a new home, and all of her premarital inheritance money was now tied up in a marital home she had to split with her soon to be ex.

When the wife contacted her lawyer to enforce her prenuptial agreement, and get back the deposit she alone paid for in their joint home, she learned the hard way her prenup would not help her. Why? Because she’d spent her inheritance on a marital home titled in both of their names. Her prenup only protected her trust fund money from being spent on paying off her husband’s student loans.

The couple came to an agreement, which was fleshed out over the next few weeks by their lawyers. They sold the house, and the wife got enough money from the sale of her marital home to pay for rent – with the help of alimony.

She was officially divorced by the end of the year, but she found out the hard way her prenup failed to protect her because she ignored it. The wife could have protected her inheritance in several ways: not putting the home in joint names, or amending her prenuptial agreement to decide how her down payment would be treated in a divorce.

Instead, she learned a few lessons. Her advice now is: “Get a prenup.”

The Business Insider article is here.

We scored another big appellate win which sheds light on the question: are you enforcing or modifying your marital settlement agreement when a family court requires the continuation of soccer and other extra-curriculars?

The Beautiful Game

In our recent appeal, the parents had three children. After less than a decade of marriage, they divorced in Portugal, but they never had a parenting plan for their children. After they both moved to Miami with the children, a family court ratified their agreed parenting plan.

Under their parenting plan, they agreed to certain extracurricular activities, including organized activities such as soccer, lessons and special training. However, the sports and activities had to be mutually agreed on by the parents in accordance with Florida’s shared parental responsibility statute.

All of the children’s current extracurricular activities, especially ‘the beautiful game,’ soccer, were agreed upon by both parents. Additionally, they agreed that the parent exercising time sharing with the children handle the transportation with the necessary equipment.

Although all three of the children were traditionally dedicated to sporting activities, their involvement in youth soccer travel teams had increased, requiring more of a time commitment because the children are expected to attend frequent practices, and regularly traveling outside of their local community for games and tournaments.

The father filed a motion to stop the soccer commitments of the children and to eliminate his obligation to transport the children to certain competitive events during his timesharing.

The family judge heard his motion, and, after considering the relative merits of the parties, along with the language reflected within the parenting plan, entreated the parties to reach an agreement as to enrollment and participation in the relevant activities.

When that failed, the court conducted another hearing and authorized the mother to re-enroll the children in their respective leagues and directing the father to transport the children to those competitive events scheduled during his timesharing.

He appealed.

Florida Marital Settlement Agreements

I’ve written about modifications and enforcement of marital settlement agreements before. Most family law cases are resolved by agreement, not by trial. A Marital Settlement Agreement is the method to resolving all of the issues, and is the final product of the negotiations.

A marital settlement agreement puts in writing all the aspects of the divorcing parties’ settlement. Topics covered in the Marital Settlement Agreement include the parenting plan and timesharing schedule, the division of the parties’ assets and liabilities, and often times: soccer and other extra-curricular activities to which the parties have agreed.

A marital settlement agreement entered into by the parties and ratified by a final judgment is a contract, subject to the laws of contract. The enforceability and modifications of contracts in Florida is a matter of importance in Florida public policy.

Because a marital settlement agreement is treated like any other contract, and is subject to interpretation like any other contract, they can be enforced by the court. Unique to marital settlement agreements though, they may be modified too.

But sometimes it is difficult to tell whether the court’s action is a modification of a contract or the enforcement of a contract. Our recent appellate goal hopefully sheds some light on that distinction.

Goal!

Ruling in our favor, the appellate court wrote an opinion stating that under the principle of shared parental responsibility, major decisions affecting the welfare of the child are to be made after the parents confer and reach an agreement.

However, in cases in which the parents cannot reach agreement on such a decision, the dispute should be presented to the trial court for resolution. In resolving the impasse, the lower tribunal must be guided by a consideration of the best interests of the child.

In our case, the parenting plan allows for shared decisions over extracurricular activities, but prohibited the unreasonable withholding of consent. So, the court was properly permitted to explore the facts and circumstances surrounding both continued participation and transportation.

At the time the parents signed the parenting plan, the children were already heavily involved in soccer. By including a provision that the “present extracurricular activities are agreed upon by both parents,” and allocating continuing enrollment expenses and other relevant allowances for league travel, the agreement clearly anticipated a continuation of such participation.

Further, as the trial court did not “change the status quo [or] alter the rights and obligations of the parties,” but merely rejected the unreasonable withholding of consent, we conclude the decision was grounded in enforcement of the existing 7 terms of the judgment, and affirmed.

The opinion is here.

Tag: enforcing agreements

When a Prenuptial Agreement Fails